# My First Skit - Concerns with the TMNT Topper **Source:** Cary Hardy **Type:** video **Published:** 2020-09-08 **Duration:** 4m 26s **Beat:** Pinball **URL:** https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q2_2PgSo8WA --- ## Analysis Cary Hardy performs a satirical skit critiquing topper design and pricing decisions, specifically about a TMNT topper. The skit depicts a conversation between a designer with design concerns (about redundant logo placement) and a dismissive manager prioritizing profit margins and scarcity tactics over customer value and design quality. ### Key Claims - [HIGH] TMNT topper has approximately $60 in materials cost — _Direct statement in skit dialogue about manufacturing cost_ - [HIGH] The game title appears on the topper logo AND on the backglass four inches away, making the topper logo redundant — _Core design criticism articulated in skit dialogue_ - [HIGH] Alternative topper designs could have featured foot soldiers, Shredder, or battle scene composition instead of game logo — _Design character suggests specific alternative approaches_ - [MEDIUM] Proposed topper retail pricing around $500 — _Character suggests '$500' as potential price point in skit_ - [HIGH] Design concerns were raised months in advance via email but ignored until too late to change — _Key narrative element of skit setup and complaint_ ### Notable Quotes > "The title of the game is literally four inches, four, four little inches away from the back glass. The back glass says Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles right there at the top" > — **Designer character (Cary Hardy)**, ~1:30 > _Core design criticism: redundant logo placement on topper when title already prominent on backglass_ > "we could have like the foot soldiers in the middle of it we could have crane shredder a number of things from the characters in that game could have been in the middle like they're ready to fight the turtles or something like that that could have been another option that would have been the better way to go but you took the easy route" > — **Designer character (Cary Hardy)**, ~1:15 > _Articulates lost design opportunity for thematic/character-focused composition_ > "we only have about $60 in materials in it, so that gives us a pretty good profit margin, especially whenever we mass produce these" > — **Manager character**, ~2:30 > _Reveals actual manufacturing cost vs retail price implication_ > "I think the logo is not big enough. So let's make it bigger. And then once again, let's figure out how much these morons are willing to pay for it." > — **Manager character**, ~3:45 > _Summarizes satirized criticism: prioritizing profit extraction over design quality and customer respect_ > "No Limit the units raise the price Do you hate the people in this hobby" > — **Designer character (Cary Hardy)**, ~2:50 > _Directly confronts scarcity-based pricing strategy as anti-customer_ ### Entities | Name | Type | Context | |------|------|---------| | Cary Hardy | person | Pinball content creator performing satirical skit about topper design and pricing | | Stern Pinball | company | Implied manufacturer of TMNT topper being criticized in skit (not explicitly named) | | Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles | game | IP theme of topper being designed and priced in skit scenario | | Kerry | person | Referenced community figure who provides fair criticism (possibly industry commentator); manager character initially confuses name as 'Corey' | ### Topics - **Primary:** Topper design philosophy and customer-centric vs profit-driven priorities, Luxury pricing strategy and scarcity-based FOMO tactics in pinball accessories, Design redundancy: logo placement on topper vs backglass, Industry satire and criticism of manufacturer decision-making - **Secondary:** Post-production design feedback and manufacturing timelines ### Sentiment **Negative** (-0.75) — Skit is satirical critique expressing frustration with manufacturer priorities (profit over design quality), dismissive management attitude toward designer concerns, and perceived contempt for customer intelligence. Tone shifts from confused/concerned to resigned/exasperated. ### Signals - **[business_signal]** Manufacturing cost structure reveals high margin potential on accessories; strategy shifts from volume sales to scarcity-based premium pricing (confidence: high) — Manager: '$60 materials' with 'good profit margin' especially with mass production; then pivots to 'limit the units raise the price' after rejecting volume approach - **[sentiment_shift]** Skit satirizes perceived contempt toward customer base; manager character dismissive of design feedback, ignores advance concerns, and explicitly refers to customers as 'morons' willing to overpay (confidence: high) — Manager: 'I know you think that our customers are idiots'; designer challenges 'Do you hate the people in this hobby'; manager makes logo bigger knowing customers will pay - **[design_philosophy]** TMNT topper logo placement criticized as redundant given game title already prominently displayed on backglass; alternative character-centric designs rejected in favor of branded logo (confidence: high) — Designer critiques that logo placement is 4 inches from existing backglass title; suggests Shredder/foot soldiers battle composition as superior alternative; manager dismisses concerns as 'easy route' - **[market_signal]** Topper priced at ~$500 with only ~$60 material cost; satirized as excessive margin extraction; strategy criticized as limiting volume sales to maximize per-unit profit rather than customer accessibility (confidence: high) — Manager states '$60 in materials' enables 'pretty good profit margin'; designer argues 'no limit the units raise the price' is customer-hostile; manager responds by making logo bigger to justify higher price - **[product_strategy]** Lost opportunity for thematic topper differentiation through character composition (Shredder, foot soldiers battle scenes) replaced with generic logo branding approach (confidence: medium) — Designer suggests multiple character-focused alternatives; manager prioritizes recognizable logo for 'people to know what game they're playing' despite backglass title visibility --- ## Transcript Hey there buddy. So I got your email and I guess I'm having some trouble understanding something here, but it says that you have some concerns about TMNT Topper. Please see me ASAP. A-S-A-P. I'm confused. What is there to be confused about? The letters A-S-A-P. It means as soon as possible. Oh, I sent that months ago. Really? Weird. Snail mail, I guess. So, what your concerns with the topper Is it not priced high enough We can fix that No look the art is fine The oscillating on the Technodrome is cool but why do we have to have the logo on it Well, how else would people know what game they're playing? Look, I know you think that our customers are idiots and everything, but we don't need the title of the game on the topper. we have plenty of other toppers that have sold just fine to prove that fact well what other options did we have well we could have like the foot soldiers in the middle of it we could have crane shredder a number of things from the characters in that game could have been in the middle like they're ready to fight the turtles or something like that that could have been another option that would have been the better way to go but you took the easy route i wanted to make sure people understood what game they were playing. The title of the game is literally four inches, four, four little inches away from the back glass. The back glass says Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles right there at the top and four inches up If that the title there again That makes no sense Ugh yeah you right Hmm How did that not get caught at the developing stage I had concerns months ago. I sent you an email. Well, it's too late now. Way to go. Get it ready for launch. You still haven't told me what you want to price this at. Hmm. Let's see. Layered plastics. Those are cheap. The motor on that Technodrome, that's got to cost us a pretty penny. Actually, we only have about $60 in materials in it, so that gives us a pretty good profit margin, especially whenever we mass produce these. Man, I'm making my mouth water thinking about all the money we could make off of this baby. like I really feel that if we price this around like 500 bucks that would be what majority of our customers would say is doable okay no limit the units raise the price we have sold so many of this title that we can make an even better profit and make a lot more customers happy if we sold in volume not by limiting it No Limit the units raise the price Do you hate the people in this hobby No Well, maybe that Corey guy that's always talking shit about us. You mean Kerry. And he's actually pretty fair. Shut your pie hole. I was just... You were just getting the topper ready for launch, as what you were doing. As a matter of fact, I think the logo is not big enough. So let's make it bigger. And then once again, let's figure out how much these morons are willing to pay for it. I wonder if other manufacturers have to deal with the same crap that I do. Thank you. _(Acquisition: youtube_groq_whisper, Enrichment: v3)_ --- *Exported from Journalist Tool on 2026-04-13 | Item ID: ce9386ec-6abb-4155-8c45-ac57e9b8126c*