# Episode 331 - 1971 Bally Hole In One **Source:** For Amusement Only EM and Bingo Pinball Podcast **Type:** podcast_episode **Published:** 2016-02-05 **Duration:** 4m 49s **Beat:** Pinball **URL:** https://foramusementonly.libsyn.com/episode-331-1971-bally-hole-in-one --- ## Analysis Nick Baldrige analyzes Bally's 1971 Hole in One, a golf-themed bingo machine known only from a single surviving backglass image. The game likely used the same backboard as Stock Market and featured six bingo cards with a skill-rating system (good/excellent/superior) that may have determined replay awards. No evidence exists that the machine entered production. ### Key Claims - [HIGH] Only a single backglass is known to exist for Hole in One; production status is unknown — _Nick Baldrige, host; primary source being analyzed_ - [MEDIUM] Hole in One likely used the same backboard as Stock Market based on card positioning — _Nick Baldrige analysis; theory based on visual layout comparison_ - [MEDIUM] The skill rating system (good/excellent/superior) probably determined replay awards — _Phil Hooper's bingo theory, relayed by Nick Baldrige_ - [MEDIUM] The game was likely scrapped and never entered full production — _Nick Baldrige inference based on lack of documentation and features_ - [HIGH] No extra features like double or nothing or corner scoring are evident on the backglass — _Nick Baldrige visual analysis of the backglass image_ ### Notable Quotes > "Unfortunately, the only thing known about it is the backglass. Nobody knows if it ever went into production or if it was ever even completed as a test machine or a sample." > — **Nick Baldrige**, ~0:30 > _Sets up the central mystery of the episode—a machine known only from one artifact_ > "All that exists is a backglass, a single backglass." > — **Nick Baldrige**, ~0:45 > _Emphasizes the extreme scarcity and obscurity of documentation for this title_ > "Phil Hooper on bingo theorizes that you earn a skill rating based on how you play and somehow that translates into some kind of replay award." > — **Nick Baldrige**, ~3:15 > _Attributes game mechanics theory to established community expert, indicates community research efforts_ > "I'm assuming that you get good if you get a three in a row, excellent for a four and superior for a five. My guess is that you earn a six card." > — **Nick Baldrige**, ~5:00 > _Shows host engaging in educated speculation based on bingo conventions and card mechanics_ > "They apparently scrapped it. And that's all we know." > — **Nick Baldrige**, ~6:30 > _Concluding statement underscoring the lost/abandoned status of the machine_ ### Entities | Name | Type | Context | |------|------|---------| | Nick Baldrige | person | Host of For Amusement Only EM and Bingo Pinball Podcast; presenter and analyst of Hole in One | | Phil Hooper | person | Bingo pinball expert cited for theoretical analysis of Hole in One skill rating mechanics | | Bally | company | Historical pinball manufacturer; producer of Hole in One (1971) | | Hole in One | game | 1971 Bally golf-themed bingo pinball machine; subject of episode analysis | | Stock Market | game | Bally bingo machine; Hole in One likely shared the same backboard layout and mechanics | | For Amusement Only EM and Bingo Pinball Podcast | organization | Podcast series focused on electromechanical and bingo pinball machines | ### Topics - **Primary:** Obscure/lost pinball history, Bingo pinball machines and mechanics, Bally manufacturing and product development - **Secondary:** Game design speculation and reverse engineering, Golf-themed pinball games, Pinball archival and documentation ### Sentiment **Neutral** (0) — Host maintains scholarly, investigative tone throughout. No strong emotional reactions; focus is on documenting an obscure piece of history and acknowledging the limits of available knowledge. Tone is curious and respectful toward the artifact. ### Signals - **[historical_signal]** Recovery and analysis of a 1971 Bally prototype machine known only from a single backglass artifact (confidence: high) — Entire episode dedicated to analyzing the sole surviving documentation of Hole in One - **[design_philosophy]** Reverse-engineering game rules and reward systems from backglass layout and comparative analysis with Stock Market (confidence: medium) — Nick Baldrige and Phil Hooper's theoretical reconstruction of skill-rating and replay mechanics - **[machine_intel]** Hole in One appears never to have entered production; scrapped at prototype/sample stage (confidence: medium) — No documentation of production, no known machines in existence, only backglass survives - **[community_signal]** EM and bingo pinball community actively researching and documenting obscure machines and their mechanics (confidence: high) — Phil Hooper's theoretical analysis cited; podcast dedicated to deep-dive research on forgotten titles - **[manufacturing_signal]** Bally apparently abandoned Hole in One during development; possible regulatory compliance concerns mentioned (confidence: medium) — Nick Baldrige speculates about legal/compliance issues and uses word 'scrapped' to describe fate --- ## Transcript What's that sound? It's 4 Amusement Only, the EM and Bingo Pinball Podcast. Welcome back to 4 Amusement Only, this is Nick Baldrige. Tonight's episode is about Bally's 1971 Hole in One. Hole in One is actually a golf themed bingo. Now unfortunately, the only thing known about it is the backglass. Nobody knows if it ever went into production or if it was ever even completed as a test machine or a sample. All that exists is a backglass, a single backglass. This backglass has a word bally and then hole in one. The O in the hole is a golf ball with a putter sticking The first three of six bingo cards It a six card just like stock market And in fact the card position is exactly the same as stock market So the theory is that it uses the same backboard as stock market Now your first three bingo cards are blue, and up above them you have your number for the card, which is actually the hole with the flag in it. One, two, and three. Then below that you have a little wood paneled section which is about a little more than a third of the back glass. On this you have a skill rating, good, excellent, and superior. Now Phil Hooper on bingo.cdyn.com theorizes that you earn a skill rating based on how you play and somehow that translates into some kind of replay or award beside the skill rating you have a golfer in midswing a golfer that's about to putt and then a golfer that has completed a swing or perhaps a golfer in midswing a golfer right as they about to connect with the ball and then the golfer after they finished connecting In between the first two golfers you have a credit window Now this also happens to be the position of the replay counter in stock market. And so the theory is that yeah you're looking at the replay meter. Then below that you have cards four, five, and six. Those are in red, and above which are a red hole and flag with the number of the card. So, unfortunately that's all that's known. There are no extra features which are denoted on the back glass, and so it's unlikely that this game had double or nothing, it's unlikely that this game had corner scoring, or much of anything. All we've got is this one image to go on, It's not an image of the reverse of the glass. We also don't know how many replays you won for being good, excellent, or superior. And I'm assuming that you get good if you get a three in a row excellent for a four and superior for a five My guess is that you earn because we talking single digits At centimet I'm sorry to say that I didn't make the six card, which was ultra compliant with many of the laws, but perhaps it was too compliant. Anyway, whatever the case is, they apparently scrapped it. And that's all we know. Well, thank you very much for joining me. My name again is Nicholas Baldridge. You can reach me at 4amusementonlypodcast at gmail.com Or you can call me on the bingos line. That's 724-BINGOS1. 724-246-4671. You can listen to us on iTunes, Stitcher, Pocket Casts, via RSS, on Facebook, on Twitter at bingopodcast. You can follow me on Instagram, also at bingopodcast. Or you can listen to us on our website, which is foramusementonly.libsyn.com. Thank you very much for listening and I'll talk to you next time. _(Acquisition: groq_whisper, Enrichment: v3)_ --- *Exported from Journalist Tool on 2026-04-13 | Item ID: f6786638-78f6-4902-a910-2b08b1668d29*