So, yeah, everyone's going, and of course a lot of people from Europe. And I don't know if I have fans in Romania and Slovenia, but you guys are sending four people? Are you kidding me? You've got 22 different countries. Wow, I need a country. Although you changed it this year. You have to live in the country, right? Correct. You can't just... No, there's no more. The Damien Charlaty rule and the Marcello rule, those days are over. I don't know Marcello. I do know Damien. Damien's a good player. He was just outside of it. Yeah, he got a free France buy from that. Yep, and Marcello got a Brazil spot. So are you seeing different growth this year? Like I talked to my good buddies Martin and Ryan from Head to Head Pinball, and apparently Australia is just going through the roof. Is that one of the big growth areas for IFPA? And as you had this success with the state and provincial championships, with the dollar money that went out, and again for the nationals, what's the next thing? Where's the next level? Is it more money into the pot? What is it? No, I don't know. I feel like, you know, we successfully round-tripped the dollar for year one. I feel like, you know, the media pieces were, there was better messaging this time around from, you know, Zach pushing out, you know, and stressing the amount of money that we're giving away. Like, it just takes time. Like I like to see a couple of years and see if we can change the narrative for pinball to be taken seriously by you know outside world people We see if the coverage that we get in Vegas if there anything that will linger you know will the people that won their states and provinces, will there be an interest in maybe the news people that covered them locally to do a follow-up piece? Because maybe this is a more serious deal than absolutely not doing a follow-up piece because it was kind of just a fluff whatever. Like, I think it's tough to really extrapolate what all this means yet. And we don't make decisions quickly. So I think we're just going to stay the course. I think you're more likely to see something like with Australia at the local level in terms of, like, is it a good time for them to look into a dollar fee to try to raise the profile of, you know, that national championship? You know, maybe. I asked, you know, Martin his feedback on that. I think they're in the process of figuring it out. I think, you know, at some point the dollar fee for women's events is going to be something that we have to figure out. I know that, you know, we're obviously giving away a pinball machine at the Women's World Championship out in Vegas, but outside of that, you know, the prize money is 24 ladies putting in 50 bucks each, 1,200 bucks. It's not the sexiest prize package ever. You know, we're happy that we're able to increase the prize package and have a 600% payout or whatever. You had some sponsorship last year for it because I know I donated to it. We did. We did. So that and that word, the connotation of that word of people donating, I don't pretend to speak for the women that are participating in this thing, so I actually reached out to them about their preference of, hey, what do you guys think about me reaching back out for, you know, quote-unquote sponsorship through really donations rather than it really being a sponsorship? and everyone felt like it almost cheapened the championship to be playing with people's donated funds. So their preference was to not actively raise funds through donations this year, which I can respect. And so that's what I did. Okay. I will bring three things to your attention as you try to grow pinball. One, pinball was named into the National Toy Hall of Fame in Rochester, New York. So that's a big deal. Secondly, as you try to grow pinball, I will remind you that at one time, ballroom dancing was an Olympic sport. Wow. Sure, it's very physical, but some could say the same about pinball, especially when you're karate kicking like Josh Sharp, not like this. And the third thing, too, as pinball tries to grow, there's this little petition going on, change.org, presented by Joe Cherovino. Is this the National Pinball Day? August 1st, your father's birthday, National Pinball Day. So, again, that's on change.org. Those are three big things to think about. Any thoughts on those? I've attempted to fill out the Olympic application in the past. It was not fun. And I think I threw the application in the garbage when we had to outline what our drug testing policy was and how we enforced, you know, whatever rules we enforced. See you later. Forget it. Right. It was like, okay, so at least I don't have to go through the other 78 pages of this application. We're just done. especially in Canada. It's legal now, so a lot of people are, yeah, you'll never see a representative from Canada. I say that jokingly. For me, you know, I get excited about, you know, there's some exciting announcements coming, Stern Pro Circuit related that I can't get into yet, but I'm excited about the ability for that to raise awareness for the sport. So, you know, you'll see some of that when the time comes. Good stuff's happening, man. It's just happening at a pace that I'm very comfortable with because I sort of live that world on the buck hunter side, but probably a pace that most people aren't patient enough to have. But I'm all smiles over here. And, of course, you'll hear that breaking news right here on the official Josh Sharp station, your podcast of choice, pinball profile, where you get all the information and everything IFPA. So we'll say yes, Jeff. Yes, Jeff. That's our agreement. I will not tell anyone else any of this information before telling you first. As long as you keep the checks coming. I've done all right there. Hey, what did you win for Illinois? What did I win? I won maybe like $100, and then I won half of Zach's pot. So it was good, man. It was a good day. 4-12 for this guy, baby. I think you won more than me or Zach. I think I won more than most states. Yeah. What did you think? How was the, I mean, you tell me as being on the other end of the dollar, how did the feel? And you guys are 24 people, right? Yes. For Ontario? Super state, yes. Everyone feel pretty good about getting paid out? How was the receipt of those funds, that other end? It was great. It was fantastic. You know, it's cash money. I don't know how we claim it when it comes time for CRA or your version of IRS, but, you know, it was good. And I think those people that all won money knew what it was going into all calendar year. Those people that weren't interested in that probably dropped off a few tournaments, but I think those people were less than there were people that were interested in it. I don't play pinball for money ever, ever, ever. Sure, me neither. Unless I'm playing LTDs, loony throwdowns here in Canada, the dollar games. That's the only time I do it. And even then, it's not even really serious pinball because you and I will be playing, and all of a sudden I'll turn the lights off and turn them on, turn them off, or, you know, kick in the back of the leg. Things like that happen in dollar games, but not in real competitions. You know, you play kind of arcade rules. Stuck ball, keep going, you know, all that kind of stuff. Again, it was a nice bonus. I'm sure I contributed that and then some to pinball in 2018, so it was nice to get a little bit of it back, but it was fun. It's a good format. The only complaint I did hear, and I heard this from a few other people. Yeah, bring it, man. I love complaints. Well, this isn't a complaint for me because I think you have to do it the way you're doing it. It was the bracket system. Sure. Because I did get people who said, you know, I had the easier path to get there. Probably, maybe, who knows. All I know is the people I played were tough as hell and they beat me all the time, so maybe. But again, other people were saying, you know, what was it? I can't, I don't want to give the person's name, but they had a weird path where they were playing in, say, the quarters. And you pretty much knew whoever won that was going to win the finals. or at least they were the best two people ranked in the quarters, and now one of them's gone. So is the bracket the best way to do it? You know what I like about it? You've got to win. Look at a guy like you in the Stern Pro Circuit final. You stunk. You came third and second in almost every game, but it was just enough to get by. You know, Steve Bowden got screwed on free fall by having three house balls, and that made you advance, and all you had to do was win the final game. That's right, man. I think, you know, for us, we do it as part of our talking points for the media, like March Madness, March Madness. Yeah. You know, the volatility of March Madness, that's something that's very easily understandable by someone on the other end, and that's only been reinforced with the interviews that I've had. It's just like, well, if you know March Madness, they put all the teams in a bracket, and you either win or go home. It's like, oh, yeah, yeah. It's like, we just do exactly that. Oh, okay, that's great. So two people playing against each other, and then there's like a winner, and it's like, yes, someone wins, and the other person, get out of there, you're done. It just makes sense. Yeah, don't change it. Out of the, I think, four years I've been in the Ontario Championships, this was my favorite, not even because of the dollars. The reason I liked it the best was because it was based on your top 20 tournaments, not how many tournaments you can possibly get in. So, yes, volume is a bit of a factor, but it's capped. Yeah, and I mean, I think, you know, for those that complain about, you know, the seating, it's not supposed to, you know, the seating, the qualifying for it is no different than any other tournament, right? So, you know, when Pinberg has qualifying, if that first round, one of your quarterfinal groups is Elwin, Raymond, Bowen, and Zach, like, is that fair? It's like, well, it sucks for that group. It's great for everyone else. That's just the way the standings shook out. The goal of a tournament qualifying system isn't meant to give the highest-ranked players the best opportunity. The qualifying system is supposed to seed players based on the qualifying data only. Again, almost a year ago, I flew to Chicago to play a four-game match where the only top two people went on, and my group was Trent Augenstein, the number one player in the pro circuit standings, some guy named Keith Elwin, a retired guy who was coming back, and Bowen Cairns and myself. And I was up for the challenge. Did I know I was going to lose? Of course. But anything I did that was successful was gravy. So that was the experience for me going, okay, can I play with these guys? If I'm at my best and they're at their worst, is there a chance? Or just whatever the case may be. And that experience, even though I lost, meant the world to me and it helped me know, okay, and same with the Ontarios, okay, when I play my best, I can play with not anyone, but a lot of people. So that was the good thing about that. And I think we've talked about this before. It's like when you're on a golf course. If you're playing with three hacks, you're probably going to have a bad game. If you're playing with three lights-out players, you will elevate your game. Yeah, man. So that's the nice thing about these things. I loved it. Don't change a thing. We won't. We're sticking it out. And there's something nice with when we get to nationals and the format's the same. It's very easy for people to get used to this single elimination bracket. Like the intro meeting, it's like, hey, so the format for today is, hey, you guys all won this format. So you guys should be plenty experienced with how it's going to go. Josh, it's always fun to talk to you, especially on Josh Sharp Day. Go have yourself some cake and don't be afraid to have some seconds.